"That’s Our Two Satoshis"  — Airbnb and DoorDash Show Why Digital Assets Need to Matter

Jeff Dorman, CFA
Dec 14, 2020
Thats Our 2 Satoshis LogoWhat happened this week in the Digital Assets markets?
Week-over-Week Price Changes (as of Sunday, 12/13/20)
 
 
WoW
YTD
Bitcoin
-0.4%
+165%
Bloomberg Galaxy Crypto Index
-4.0%
+197%
S&P 500
-1.0%
+8%
Gold (XAU)
+0.1%
+21%
Oil (Brent)
=0.7%
-24%
Source: TradingView, CNBC, Bloomberg
 
Fed Doublespeak, Fixed Income, Insane IPOs and Digital Assets are all related
This may sound like one giant stream of consciousness, but it is all interconnected.   Per Edward Jones, the S&P 500 has hit 30 new all-times highs in 2020, 17 of which were recorded after the February pandemic-induced bear market, and four of which were recorded in the last two weeks alone.   Why?  Corporate profit optimism is a lame excuse, as is the vaccine, since both of these future events are outcomes that were already priced into inflated markets eventually… they just got delayed.  The real reason is that fixed income investors are screwed, possibly forever, and everyone knows that the Fed has eliminated risky consequences.

Let’s start with the Fed.  Sven Henrich from Northman Trader has been all over the Fed’s double-speak for years, and recently illuminated an interesting passage from Jerome Powell back in 2012. In the FOMC minutes from October 2012, Powell (at the time a Fed Governor) said the following:
 
“I have concerns about more purchases. As others have pointed out, the dealer community is now assuming close to a $4 trillion balance sheet and purchases through the first quarter of 2014. I admit that is a much stronger reaction than I anticipated, and I am uncomfortable with it for a couple of reasons.  First, the question, why stop at $4 trillion? The market in most cases will cheer us for doing more. It will never be  enough for the market. Our models will always tell us that we are helping the economy, and I will probably always feel that those benefits are overestimated. And we will be able to tell ourselves that market function is not impaired and that inflation expectations are under control. What is to stop us, other than much faster economic growth, which it is probably not in our power to produce? Second, I think we are actually at a point of encouraging risk-taking, and that should give us pause. Investors really do understand now that we will be there to prevent serious losses. It is not that it is easy for them to make money but that they have every  incentive to take more risk,and they are doing so. Meanwhile, we look like we are blowing a fixed-income duration bubble right across the credit spectrum that will result in big losses when rates come up down the road. You can almost say that that is our strategy. My third concern—and others have touched on it as well—is the problems of exiting from a near $4 trillion balance sheet.”
We had no plan back in 2012.  The problem is even worse now, and we have even less of a plan today.  And Powell is not alone.  Incoming Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen is equally wishy washy.  As David Rosenberg jests, the Fed is like the heart doctor at an eating contest -- gorge all you want, they’ll keep you alive.
 
Picture121420
 
Over the last 10 years, the “everything rally” has created such insane investment gains across all asset classes, that there really weren’t notable fund flows in any one direction.  No matter what you owned, it was working, and would likely continue to work.  But that is all finally starting to change.  Fixed income investors are now screwed, and they all know it.  Sure, they are still binging on debt, but go talk off-the-record to any fixed income fund manager or sales person, and they’ll tell you that their job has a short shelf life.  Corporate bonds are now yielding less than inflation -- the first time that has ever happened. As John Street Capital points out:
 
“The annual expected inflation rate over the next decade is 1.89% according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. The average IG corporate bond yield is just 1.85% per Bloomberg Barclays data. This has already had & will have a profound effect on risk assets.”
Picture1214201Source: Bloomberg / Twitter @TaviCosta
 
Good luck with that 60 / 40 portfolio.  As GMO highlights, the point of the 60/40 portfolio is to give you bond investment gains during periods of equity turmoil. They cite:
 
“Income is only a piece of the puzzle. The inimitable charm of government bonds over the last 30 years or so has been their wonderful tendency to give capital gains when the world starts to fall apart. Five times out of six, the 10-Year note did a wonderful job of cushioning the pain of the bear market, and across all six bear markets it averaged a double-digit capital gain. The fly in the ointment is that those capital gains came from an expectation that the Federal Reserve would reduce interest rates to combat any economic weakness. In each of the above events, such a reduction was possible. Today that is probably no longer true.”
Some wealth managers are beginning to offer solutions to this problem, sort of.  Bond bull AllianceBernstein recently made headlines for suggesting that Bitcoin now has a place in a diversified investment portfolio.  While the Bitcoin headlines excited a few, the recommended portfolio that AB suggested should have their clients absolutely terrified.
 
Picture1214202
 
Which brings us to the IPO market.  Nothing even has to be said about this.  It’s pure insanity. And why shouldn’t it be?  The Fed and the fixed income market are daring investors to hold cash and bonds.  You might as well buy every new equity issue regardless of fundamentals or growth.
 
Picture1214203
Source: CNBC / Twitter @LesliePicker
 
Which leads us to last week’s Airbnb and DoorDash IPOs.  On the one hand, 100% gains in the first week of trading show that investment banks are clueless and that companies are leaving money on the table.  On the other hand, this is great news for investors right?  
 
Except it isn’t.
 
Prior to the IPO, Airbnb had a handful of investors, all of whom were already hilariously rich.  Airbnb also has 188 employees, who are now hilariously rich.   But marketplaces don’t succeed because of investors or employees… marketplaces succeed because of suppliers of product, and consumers of product.  In the case of Airbnb, there are almost 3 million hosts, and 500 million customers, yet over $100 billion in investment gains were created before the majority of these people will make any money off of the success they created (Doordash similarly has 20 million users and 340,000 participating restaurants).  Oh, forgive me, Airbnb’s PR team half-heartedly gave $238 million of the $100 billion to its community.  Gee, thanks.
 
If you’ve come this far, hopefully you are as angry as I am, and are starting to see why this has everything to do with digital assets.  While blockchain began with “cryptocurrency” and Bitcoin, it is now much deeper than that.  It has become a tool for companies and projects to raise capital, bootstrap their growth, and give both the financial gains and product utility to their communities.  In the case of Airbnb and Doordash, their investors (financial gain) differ from their users (utility).  In the case of every company that has issued a digital asset, the community of users ARE the investors.  While a blockchain is not necessary for this to occur, it has proven to be the most fair and easy way to pull this dynamic off.  Companies who issue digital assets are not faceless technologies -- they are companies with developers, employees, customers, hosts and everything in between, and this new technologically-enabled asset class has given both tech and non-tech companies the ability to empower their entire stakeholder group, not just its shareholders. You will see a digital asset in every company’s capital structure in the near future.  Until then, there are a handful of companies and projects where every day customers, developers, employees and investors are working together to both get rich and build successful products. 
 
The IPO market has become a farce. Fortunately, there is now an alternative.
 
Picture1214204
 
What’s Driving Token Prices?
Bitcoin traded in a wide range last week, but ultimately went nowhere despite multiple large financial institutions announcing support.  As Coinbase pointed out, there was support for custodying digital assets (Standard Chartered & Northern Trust), trading digital assets,  (DBS, the largest bank in Southeast Asia by assets), and both (in the case of BBVA, the second largest bank in Spain).
 
  • The DeFi sector as a whole was beaten up, generically falling 10% week-over week, as futures markets seem to be driving the price action.   Uniswap (UNI), YearnFinance (YFI), Synthetix (SNX), Thorchain (RUNE) and NexusMutual (NXM) all moved down in tandem.  Sushiswap (SUSHI) bucked the trend, rising +7% as Sushi continues to eat into the parity level of UNI, with product innovation (BentoBox) and increased resources (YFI merger) giving it a bit of a thruster boost.
  • Axie Infinity (AXS) rose +25% as the Land demo proved successful, and metrics for game usage (marketplace revenue and breeding fee revenues) continue to hockey stick. These revenues will soon go to Axie's DAO and to an extent token holders, giving AXS holders a tangible asset backing the token.
What We’re Reading this Week

 

And That’s Our Two Satoshis! 
Thanks for reading everyone!   
Questions or comments, just let us know.  

The Arca Portfolio Management Team
Jeff Dorman, CFA - Chief Investment Officer
Katie Talati - Head of Research
Hassan Bassiri, CFA - PM / Analyst
Sasha Fleyshman -  Trader  
Wes Hansen -  Head of Trading & Operations
Alex Woodward- Analyst
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
To learn more or talk to us about investing in digital assets and cryptocurrency
call us now at (424) 289-8068.
 

 

 

 

Subscribe For the Latest Blockchain News & Analysis

 

 

Disclaimer: This commentary is provided as general information only and is in no way intended as investment advice, investment research, legal advice, tax advice, a research report, or a recommendation. Any decision to invest or take any other action with respect to any investments discussed in this commentary may involve risks not discussed, and therefore, such decisions should not be based solely on the information contained in this document. Please consult your own financial/legal/tax professional.

Statements in this communication may include forward-looking information and/or may be based on various assumptions. The forward-looking statements and other views or opinions expressed are those of the author, and are made as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated and there is no guarantee that any particular outcome will come to pass. The statements made herein are subject to change at any time. Arca disclaims any obligation to update or revise any statements or views expressed herein. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results and there can be no assurance that any future results will be realized. Some or all of the information provided herein may be or be based on statements of opinion. In addition, certain information provided herein may be based on third-party sources, which is believed to be accurate, but has not been independently verified. Arca and/or certain of its affiliates and/or clients may now, or in the future, hold a financial interest in investments that are the same as or substantially similar to the investments discussed in this commentary. No claims are made as to the profitability of such financial interests, now, in the past or in the future and Arca and/or its clients may sell such financial interests at any time. The information provided herein is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities, or a solicitation to provide investment advisory services.