Data Room
Get in Touch
Menu
Investor Portal
Get in Touch

The Bitcoin Community Should be Embarrassed

Jeff Dorman, CFA
May 17, 2021

What happened this week in the Digital Assets markets

Week-over-Week Price Changes (as of Sunday, 5/16/21)
Screen Shot 2021-05-17 at 6.51.13 AM
 
Make Sure you Glorify the Right People
There are many real reasons for the current volatility in global markets, and last week’s weakness in digital assets.  Economic data is booming, but employment data is sending mixed signals.  Inflation is here, but no one knows if it is transitory or not.  Decisions are being made because of rising rates, but nominal rates themselves aren’t actually moving.  Digital assets have been flying for months but crypto stocks are tanking.  The VIX was basically unchanged over the past eight days, but the S&P 500 suffered its worst three-day loss (Monday-Wednesday) in nearly seven months (-4%) before snapping back to recover most of the losses on Thursday and Friday.  
 
Any of these reasons would have been enough to cause digital assets to finally crack too… but unfortunately the only factor anyone is talking about is Elon Musk, and more Elon Musk
 
After reading hundreds of responses to this circus, it turns out the most prevalent and succinct came from an internal slack sent by Arca’s own CEO, Rayne Steinberg: 
 
“The fact that this conversation around Bitcoin energy consumption is being driven by a celebrity like Elon Musk gives us more insight about our society than it does about the actual issue. Elon said Bitcoin is good and therefore it was. Now he says it is bad, so it is bad. Has the reality of the situation changed or does this illustrate the dangers of relying on the rich and famous to drive our decision-making? The energy consumption issue, like most things, is nuanced and has many factors to be considered on both sides. We feel, broadly, that when you compare the net energy consumed to what is possibly gained (a faster, more efficient and fair financial system), it’s more than a fair trade.”
He’s absolutely right.  Some view Bitcoin’s benefits positively enough to offset any negative externalities, while others do not.  Nothing has changed.  Yet at the same time, nothing really changed on the way up either when Bitcoin ran 500% from October to March. Earlier this year we illustrated how Bitcoin rallied numerous times on the same news over and over and over again, often directly due to comments from Musk himself, so it’s only natural that Bitcoin should suffer when this “news” reverses.  

And the market reaction was almost perfectly rational.  The “news” (if you can even call it that) has been entirely specific to Bitcoin (and maybe a few other proof-of-work tokens), and during the first part of the week, the cryptocurrency sub-sector of the digital assets market bore the brunt of the selling.  It was only later in the week when Bitcoin’s continuous declines (now -25% month-to-date) began to finally weigh on other types of digital assets, even though they are mostly completely unaffected by any of the newfound discussions this week. Literally, as I’m typing this (at 10:56pm PST on Sunday night), Musk again single-handedly caused a $2,500 move upward in the price of Bitcoin simply by tweeting this:
 
unnamed - 2021-05-17T065214.923Source: Twitter / @elonmusk
 
This kind of price action related to a single person is embarrassing, but it’s the Bitcoin community themselves that should be the most embarrassed.  After years of building quietly as the underdog, they all chose to glorify an eccentric loudmouth over the past several months, celebrating each unnatural gain caused by repetitive "positive" news and sending out obnoxious emails/texts/tweets/newsletters about how important this was.  And now they are mad and defensive because their hero wears a black cape and the narrative has flipped.  Bitcoin’s ultimate long-term success or failure will have nothing to do with Elon Musk, but the fact that the short-term price does is a reflection of all of the insane propaganda and celebrations regarding his involvement.  The bulk of the media, the “Twitter celebrities”, and the early asset managers in this space that dedicate their livelihoods to convincing people that Bitcoin is some stand alone asset on top of the pantheon made a choice to stick with the tried and true narrative of the past 10+ years, or to make a quick buck off of Elon Musk - they chose the latter, and these actions have consequences. 
 
If you’re a Bitcoin maximalist for reasons other than “it’s a good way to increase twitter followers via groupthink and likemindedness”, you are doing yourself a massive disservice.  You are early to a new and evolutionary technology, but you are wasting your advantage like a 6’10” person who doesn’t believe in basketball.  “Bitcoin dominance” is not a thing (by definition, the proportion of this asset class represented by Bitcoin’s market cap has to go down over time since there are infinite new tokens being created that make up the rest of the field).  Bitcoin also doesn’t “give other tokens permission” to rally, as suggested by another popular asset manager. And Bitcoin doesn’t need Elon Musk to validate it. These are tired, stale narratives and flawed metrics that have somehow become “law” for no reason, no different than old baseball stats like a pitcher’s “win”, which has now been cast aside as a meaningless measure of success but is still being used by 80-year old baseball analysts.

Bitcoin is great, and the price will likely rise again. Ethereum is great and the price will likely rise again. Hundreds of other pass-thru tokens, asset-backed tokens, and protocol / platform tokens are great too, many of which have real tokenomics that drive economic value (and thus token price increases). The only thing mutually exclusive about these assets are the people supporting them. 
 
unnamed - 2021-05-17T065225.051
Source:  Twitter / @RaoulGMI
 
If not Elon Musk, Where Should You Get Information?
I honestly wouldn’t even know what Elon Musk was saying if it wasn’t for all of the questions we get about him - that’s how little I pay attention to his tweets, and the tweets of other pseudo-Bitcoin social media celebrities.  But speaking of questions, we frequently get asked “well, how can I get started learning about this industry?”  Given that “a lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes” (attributed to Mark Twain), it’s as good a time as any to show off a list of resources that I read daily and weekly to help stay on top of the most relevant information regarding digital assets. By no means is this all-inclusive, but it’s a good starting point into the world of professional investing in this asset class (Note: I read many things that are more macro-focused, but this list is exclusive to digital assets-centric information).
 
My daily morning routine consists of the following reading:
 
  • The Digital Asset - Written by a former investment banker and current employee of digital asset trade order management system, OmniEx, this is the best run-down of relevant news that hit the tape. 
  • Unqualified Opinions - A research-intensive email written by Ryan Selkis at Messari, which always features one deep-dive into a specific digital asset and its fundamentals, from a member of the Messari analyst team.
  • The Defiant - A deep-dive into DeFi, written by the talented Camilla Russo.
  • Kraken OTC daily -- A nightly recap of the day’s trading events, complete with OTC flows, technical analysis and news alerts.
My weekly reading consists of the following:
 
  • Our Network - A collection of real-time updates about different digital assets, written by various members of their individual developer communities (as compiled by Spencer Noon).
  • Coinbase Weekly Commentary -- written and disseminated specifically to Coinbase institutional customers, this market recap dives into news, on-chain analytics, derivatives, DeFi and other statistics that help decipher the past week’s price action.
  • Crypto Long & Short - probably the best op-ed available, Coindesk director of Research, Noelle Acheson, delivers her own weekly narrative, and also interprets the meaning of various news weekly news items. 
  • Bitmex Crypto Trader Digest - Another op-ed, this time by Bitmex founder Arthur Hayes, delivers good insights into the structure behind trades and derivatives.
Paid Research:
 
  • Anything written by Messari, Delphi Digital and the Block, as well recaps from institutional OTC desks like FTX, Galaxy, Genesis and Cumberland.
I also have alerts set on a few Twitter followers, to ensure that I don’t miss specific items:
 
  • Larry Cermak at the Block -- Probably the most accurate, and fastest, at uncovering and explaining real-time information driving markets, including on-chain analytics from hacks and wallet movements.
  • Jon Cheesman and SBF at FTX - Quickly becoming one of the most relevant exchanges with information driving markets.
  • Tony Stewart and QCP - Two of the best at uncovering noticeable patterns in the growing derivatives market
What’s Driving Token Prices?
Several tokens saw new all-time-highs, only to have their legs swept out by the broader market selloff:
 
  • YFI (+7%) - one of the lead developers on YFI created a coin called WOOFY and pegged it to YFI, giving it a 1 billion coin supply, versus YFI's 36,666 supply. As WOOFY was priced much lower than YFI, this set off a retail buying frenzy, driving the price of YFI up to $90k (a 60% increase) before ultimately retreating to close the week at $60k.
  • AAVE (+1%) - Stani Kulechov (Founder of Aave) confirmed that Aave is testing out “a private pool for institutions”.   These private pools contain only funds that have gone through AML/KYC, giving institutional investors more comfort when interacting with DeFi. AAVE touched an ATH of $624 before closing the week at $491.  
  • PERP (0%) -  Perpetual Protocol posted great volume growth this month, reaching ATH daily volumes of $513m on Thursday, which would rank it 3rd on overall DEXs. The increased metrics reflected in the token price, which grew to $12.84 (ATH), before losing the week at $8.82."
  • BNB (-14%) - Binance Smart Chain experienced some legitimate difficulties this entire week - their blockchain was throttled early on, then closed off, then reset, and then that process repeated a few more times. There are also some rumors swirling that Binance is facing investigations from the Justice Dept. and the IRS, which were quickly refuted via Twitter.  BNB lost -14% on the week, and other parts of the BSC ecosystem fell more (CAKE -21%, VNS -30%).
  • MATIC +87% - Ecosystem participants are moving on Polygon to find relief from the congested Ethereum L1.  Polygon is a L2 solution for Ethereum that has already attracted many L1 Defi projects such as Aave and 1inch.  Polygon has consistently outdone Ethereum in the number of on-chain transactions since the beginning of May, reaching a staggering ATH of 3.5M transactions in a day. This data shows the urgent need of scaling for Ethereum in order to keep pace with the exponential growth in interest from existing and new participants.
What We’re Reading This Week
 
 
 
 

 

And That’s Our Two Satoshis! 
Thanks for reading everyone!   
Questions or comments, just let us know.  

The Arca Portfolio Management Team
Jeff Dorman, CFA - Chief Investment Officer
Katie Talati - Head of Research
Hassan Bassiri, CFA - PM / Analyst
Sasha Fleyshman -  Trader  
Wes Hansen -  Head of Trading & Operations
Alex Woodard- Analyst
Mike Geraci- Trader
  
To learn more or talk to us about investing in digital assets and cryptocurrency
call us now at (424) 289-8068.
 

Subscribe For the Latest Blockchain News & Analysis

Disclaimer: This commentary is provided as general information only and is in no way intended as investment advice, investment research, a research report or a recommendation. Any decision to invest or take any other action with respect to the securities discussed in this commentary may involve risks not discussed herein and such decisions should not be based solely on the information contained in this document.

Statements in this communication may include forward-looking information and/or may be based on various assumptions. The forward-looking statements and other views or opinions expressed herein are made as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated and there is no guarantee that any particular outcome will come to pass. The statements made herein are subject to change at any time. Arca disclaims any obligation to update or revise any statements or views expressed herein.

In considering any performance information included in this commentary, it should be noted that past performance is not a guarantee of future results and there can be no assurance that future results will be realized. Some or all of the information provided herein may be or be based on statements of opinion. In addition, certain information provided herein may be based on third-party sources, which information, although believed to be accurate, has not been independently verified. Arca and/or certain of its affiliates and/or clients hold and may, in the future, hold a financial interest in securities that are the same as or substantially similar to the securities discussed in this commentary. No claims are made as to the profitability of such financial interests, now, in the past or in the future and Arca and/or its clients may sell such financial interests at any time. The information provided herein is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has not been reviewed or approved by any regulatory authority and has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances or objectives of persons who may receive it. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.

You May Also Like

These Stories on Market Recap

No Comments Yet

Let us know what you think

©2020 by Arca Funds Past performance is not indicative of future results. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of funds sponsored by Arca Funds (the "Funds"). Other important information about the Funds are in each respective Fund's offering documents. A Fund's offering documents should be read carefully before investing. Disclaimer: This commentary is provided as general information only and is in no way intended as investment advice, investment research, a research report or a recommendation. Any decision to invest or take any other action with respect to the securities discussed in this commentary may involve risks not discussed herein and such decisions should not be based solely on the information contained in this document.