“That’s Our 2 Satoshis” — A Flurry of Unique Opportunities Arise During the Bear Market

Jeff Dorman, CFA
Aug 29, 2022

Thats Our 2 Satoshis LogoWhat Happened This Week in the Digital Assets Markets?

Week-over-Week Price Changes (as of Sunday, 08/28/22)
Week over week digital asset price change
Source: TradingView, CNBC, Bloomberg, Messari
 
Macro is Back
For the past two months, we’ve pointed out the bifurcation in digital assets and how token price moves have been driven by market leaders and idiosyncratic factors rather than macro. We even went as far as to say that digital assets have already decoupled from macro. Then, last week, we were reminded that central banks may no longer be in the driver’s seat, but they can still grab the wheel whenever they feel like it.
 
Fed Chairman Powell decided not to mince words last week at Jackson Hole and delivered a short, hawkish speech to remind markets not to get too complacent. The Fed isn’t pausing, and global markets got the message. Stocks, bonds, the dollar, and digital assets all responded in unison to the hawkish message. The Fed governors continue to talk nonstop about rate hikes and beating inflation as if it’s not in their control instead of just ripping the bandage off and jacking them higher all at once. This is the Fed’s game of chicken. They know rate hikes don’t actually do anything to combat supply-side inflation. They know their transparent guidance is already priced in by the market anyway. And since the most considerable risk is that consumers fear inflation so much that they actually make it worse by front-loading purchases, their main job is to jawbone about how they are “tackling it” just long enough until natural deflationary forces bring it down (which is already happening). 
 
So here we are once again, forced to battle the short-term trader’s reaction to hawkish rhetoric versus the long-term investing game of “where else are you going to invest?” The pace of rate hikes is clearly slowing, even as rates go up. With real rates still negative, investors essentially have to own stocks, real estate, and digital assets eventually to beat long-term inflation. At times like this, we’re reminded how little advantage there is to try to time these moves. As Peter Lynch said, “Far more money has been lost by investors preparing for corrections than has been lost in the corrections themselves.” If you’d invested $1,000 in the Nasdaq in 1971, that investment would have grown to $130,000 today (blue line). But if you took that same investment and missed the index’s 20 best-performing days (gray line), you’d have only $26,000 to your name. What’s even more interesting is that most of the Nasdaq’s best-performing days happened during major bear markets, not bull markets. 
So if you choose to ride out the volatility, the question becomes where to look within digital assets to find opportunities to participate in the inevitable recoveries.
 
Nasdaq investment
Source: Finimize
 
Beneath the Broad Market Moves Are a Lot of  Interesting Potential Investment Ideas
“It’s all one trade” is a common refrain this year. While this may be true day-to-day or week-to-week, the return dispersion over longer time horizons continues to favor “token pickers.” That said, this dispersion can’t happen until the overall health of digital assets returns. Since most companies, projects, and businesses in digital assets today are at the infrastructure layer, user growth, transaction growth, and trading volumes have to improve before any digital asset company can truly succeed.

We estimate that there are roughly 350 million digital asset users/owners. That number roughly matches how many internet users there were in 2000. Applying the same +19% CAGR of internet users from 2000 to 2010 would imply a digital asset market cap of roughly $7 trillion in 2032 (from $1 trillion today). 
 
Global Internet and Digital Asset Users
Source: Arca estimates using data from here and here
 
There are many ways to monitor digital asset user, transaction, and volume growth, but anywhere you look paints the same story: growth has slowed over the past twelve months. Until it returns, most fundamental valuations will look expensive. On the flip side, many digital asset businesses have very high operating leverage to user growth, meaning a small positive change in user activity will lead to large gains in token prices. 
 
Ethereum Network
Cryptocurrency Exchange
Source: The Block
 
While these three factors are the most important to monitor for overall health and strength, that doesn’t mean there won’t be any winners in today’s market. For example, in the debt and equity investment arena, bear markets lead to creative financing and investment structures. Similarly, we’re beginning to see digital asset companies, projects, and DAOs get creative as their token prices plummet and fundamentals fall. In the last few months alone, we’ve seen a few interesting developments, restructurings, liquidations, and reboots—all of which have implications for token prices. These include, but are not limited to:
 
  • Investors in Uniswap (UNI)—one of the most profitable entities with a famously “useless governance token”—have begun exploring ways to return some of these profits to token holders via a “fee switch.” While this lever was always available to Uniswap, it is gaining more traction today as the token suffers even as the Uniswap protocol continues to gain market share in DEX trading. Changing a token’s dynamics via governance is one of the best ways to extract value from digital assets.
  • On August 19th, Fei Labs proposed the dissolution of the Tribe DAO (TRIBE) after missteps and innovation that included a DAO “merger,” a large hack, and the invention of protocol-controlled value (which enabled the protocol to actively manage deposits for yield generation). Naturally, the return of DAO assets turns a growth story into a book value investment thesis. It depends heavily on who is entitled to these assets and how fast the resolution occurs. The liquidation proposal will include three major independent components: consolidation, Fuse hack victim payment, and final redemption. A back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests these assets are worth a minimum of $0.29 per TRIBE (compared to the current price of $0.23). These “merger-arb”-like investment opportunities tend not to happen during bull markets.
Dissolution of the Tribe DAOSource: The Block
 
  • Luna (LUNC), While the future of Luna Classic remains unclear, over 4,000 “Lunatics” are actively engaged in resurrecting the blockchain. It seems to be alive and kicking despite losing its main application, the algorithmic stablecoin UST. This past weekend, a group of developers restored governance and validator delegation rights to the Terra network. Following the network’s relaunch, there are now 261 billion LUNC staked. The total quantity staked has gone up from .004% to 4% of total LUNC supply in just a few days.  The LUNC market cap is rising as it trades significantly lower than other ghost Layer 1 protocols with no activity and no users. This again highlights one of the differences between quick and community-led blockchain reorgs and traditional, slow-moving bankruptcy processes that are driven by long and drawn-out legal processes under the bankruptcy codes.
  • dYdX (DYDX), the leading decentralized derivatives exchange with over 80% market share, recently announced that it is moving to a standalone blockchain based on the Cosmos SDK. Of course, to do this, their previously “useless governance token” also needs to morph into a staking token to secure the network. This leaves the possibility open that almost $500 million of trailing 12-month revenue—which has historically passed through directly to a private company called “dYdX Trading”—could soon find its way accruing directly to DYDX token holders. Should this happen, the DYDX token immediately morphs into one of the cheapest tokens in the market using any traditional yield or cash flow metric.

    leading decentralized derivatives exchange
While the market continues to get whipsawed by the Fed’s jawboning, the real money will be made by navigating the unique differences between different token types and their value accrual mechanisms.
 
 
 And That’s Our Two Satoshis! 
Thanks for reading everyone!   
Questions or comments, just let us know.  
 
The Arca Portfolio Management Team
Jeff Dorman, CFA - Chief Investment Officer
Katie Talati - Director of Research
Hassan Bassiri, CFA - Portfolio Manager 
Sasha Fleyshman - Portfolio Manager
Alex Woodard - Research Analyst
Nick Hotz, CFA - Research Analyst
Bodhi Pinker- Research Analyst 
Wes Hansen - Director of Trading & Operations
Kyle Doane - Trader
David Nage - Principal, Venture Investing
Michael Dershewitz - Principal, Venture Investing
Michal Benedykcinski - Research Analyst
Andrew Masotti - Trading Operations
Topher Macpherson - Trading Operations
  
To learn more or talk to us about investing in digital assets and cryptocurrency
call us now at (424) 289-8068.
 

Subscribe For the Latest Blockchain News & Analysis

Disclaimer: This commentary is provided as general information only and is in no way intended as investment advice, investment research, a research report or a recommendation. Any decision to invest or take any other action with respect to the securities discussed in this commentary may involve risks not discussed herein and such decisions should not be based solely on the information contained in this document.

Statements in this communication may include forward-looking information and/or may be based on various assumptions. The forward-looking statements and other views or opinions expressed herein are made as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated and there is no guarantee that any particular outcome will come to pass. The statements made herein are subject to change at any time. Arca disclaims any obligation to update or revise any statements or views expressed herein.

In considering any performance information included in this commentary, it should be noted that past performance is not a guarantee of future results and there can be no assurance that future results will be realized. Some or all of the information provided herein may be or be based on statements of opinion. In addition, certain information provided herein may be based on third-party sources, which information, although believed to be accurate, has not been independently verified. Arca and/or certain of its affiliates and/or clients hold and may, in the future, hold a financial interest in securities that are the same as or substantially similar to the securities discussed in this commentary. No claims are made as to the profitability of such financial interests, now, in the past or in the future and Arca and/or its clients may sell such financial interests at any time. The information provided herein is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has not been reviewed or approved by any regulatory authority and has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances or objectives of persons who may receive it. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.

No Comments Yet

Let us know what you think

Disclaimer: This commentary is provided as general information only and is in no way intended as investment advice, investment research, a research report or a recommendation. Any decision to invest or take any other action with respect to the securities discussed in this commentary may involve risks not discussed herein and such decisions should not be based solely on the information contained in this document.