“That’s Our Two Satoshis” — A Correction Like Every Other, but DeFi Ultimately Won

Jeff Dorman, CFA
May 24, 2021

Thats Our 2 Satoshis LogoWhat happened this week in the Digital Assets market
Week-over-Week Price Changes (as of Sunday, 5/16/21)

Screen Shot 2021-05-24 at 7.49.58 AM
 
A Correction Like No Every Other
Last week was plain ugly.  For newcomers, this was shocking.  For old hats, this was perhaps nothing new, but unbelievably swift nonetheless.  For perspective, using Bitcoin as a proxy for the market, let’s just say “we’ve been here before”.
 

image022

Source: Cliffwater
 
But there was something a bit more unsettling about the speed, and cause, of this pullback.  We’re going to get to China and ESG in a minute, but let’s start by acknowledging that the broad-based moves across the digital assets market were due to a lot of factors beyond just China.  First, we’ve seen a huge pullback in crypto stocks since mid-April.  
 

unnamed - 2021-05-24T080917.319

Source: TradingView
 
Second, the inflation/tapering narrative is weighing on all risky assets -- tech stocks, IPOs, SPACs and digital assets all peaked around the same time that the U.S. M2 year-over-year growth rate peaked and rolled over.
 
unnamed - 2021-05-24T080922.322Source: Twitter / @marcomadness2
 
Third, large Bitcoin put buying led to a gamma squeeze in the derivatives dealer community, which led to momentum traders piling on the short side and pushing the market over a cliff.
 
The above factors won’t get much press, but they all started long before Elon Musk tweeted about Bitcoin’s energy usage, and Friday’s subsequent news out of China. 
 
The Largest Coordinated Attack in History
There are now hundreds of articles summarizing what the news out of China means, but at present, there is literally no definitive information other than the initial statement which came at 11pm local time on Friday night in China.  Our friends at GSR and FTX summarized it well that day in their morning note to clients:
 
GSR:  “Bitcoin fell sharply after a Chinese government website posted a statement earlier today summarizing the last meeting of the Financial Stability and Development Committee of the State Council. Chaired by Vice Premier Liu He, the Council’s statement singled out BTC as an asset it needs to regulate more. The statement said that China should crack down on BTC mining and trading and “resolutely prevent the transmission of individual risks to society”. This is noteworthy because Liu is the most senior Chinese official to publicly call for a crackdown on BTC. This is also the first time the government has explicitly targeted BTC mining. BTC mining is a big business in China and ~75% of the world’s BTC mining is done in China, where there is cheap electricity and relatively easy access to manufacturers who make specialized hardware. This crackdown on mining may be related to Musk’s recent comments about BTC’s energy consumption. The Chinese government made a commitment to carbon neutrality last year and reports of China cracking down on energy-intensive BTC mining operations have been trickling in over the past few weeks. BTC mining was banned in China’s Inner Mongolian province last month. This province is the country’s second-largest coal producer and earlier today the local government set up a dedicated whistleblower hotline to comprehensively shut down any illegal mining operations in the region. BTC mining operations in Sichuan have been operating at a limited capacity since the state has mandated them to limit their hydroelectricity consumption due to an unusually warm May.”
 
FTX: “The last leg lower on Friday was driven by China headlines on mining and trading. It's always difficult to interpret policy in China.  It seems most likely that the comment is aimed at mining and focused on both the ESG and protecting capital flight (which is often facilitated by investments in BTC mining). This may have been as a verbal concession to the environmental lobby though mining uses a lot of renewable energy and also energy that wont be used otherwise. A larger crackdown on mining in China would actually lessen two areas of concern for crypto - centralized mining in China and removing some of the dirtier energy consumption.”
That said, make no mistake about it, the final leg of this downtrade was a global, coordinated attack on Bitcoin. Eric Peters, CIO of One River Asset Management, summed it up succinctly. 
 
In human history, no single asset has come under such coordinated assault by the very global institutions that perpetually inflate asset prices in the name of securing prosperity. And yet, through it all, digital asset trading carried on, obliterating the leveraged longs, wiping out the weak. For the first time in decades, we saw the ferocious beauty of truly free markets operating at scale. Efficiently. Ruthlessly. These assets inhabit a world without a buyer of last resort to bail out its bankers. It was a remarkable display of antifragility. To appreciate it fully, simply imagine how today’s equity, bond and credit markets would withstand a withdrawal of government support, let alone a full-frontal assault. It is this independence and resiliency that underpins the longer-term attractiveness of digital assets. But like all powerful new technologies, their promise is poorly understood by most pundits. And amongst the many benefits that such technologies will produce, one of the more ironic is that despite today’s outcry, they have already begun to spur and finance an accelerating global transition to renewable energy.
In 2011, governments around the world conspired to rescue global markets from a double-dip recession.  Now, they are conspiring to kill the only free market left which coincidentally rose from the ashes of that same government liquidity response.  There is a bull case here though.  First, long-term, removing China’s dominance over Bitcoin should lead to a reduction in Bitcoin’s carbon footprint and an increase in security. Second, the US regulatory crackdown is actually setting the stage for a sustainable policy, one where it’s pretty easy to comply with the laws as long as you aren’t purposefully trying to evade them. 
 
Regardless, it is pretty amazing that in a year flanked by government overreach, massive monetary and fiscal stimulus, and inflation/taper talk,  Bitcoin is only +20% YTD.  
 
Perhaps even more interesting is that in a week dominated by Bitcoin-specific negative news, Bitcoin actually outperformed the rest of the digital assets market. 
 
A Massive 4-day Selloff in Layer 1 Protocols, DeFi, CeFi and other Pass-Through Tokens
Just five days ago, Bitcoin was selling off while other digital assets were thriving, a response that was perfectly rational given all of the negative news directly aimed towards Bitcoin.  But beginning Wednesday, accelerating Friday, and puking all over itself on Sunday, was the rest of the digital assets market.  The speed of these declines was breathtaking.  Correlations rose to 1.0, betas rose to 3-5x, and seemingly no asset was safe.
 
Declines from All-Time-Highs for Select, Popular Digital Assets
unnamed - 2021-05-24T080926.690
Source: Twitter / @lawmaster
 
But DeFi Passed a Major Stress Test
Throughout the carnage though, there were a few clear winners.  First, DeFi passed a major stress test.  There were over $10 billion of futures liquidations on Wednesday last week, and $1 billion more on Decentralized trading platforms and lending platforms.
 
unnamed - 2021-05-24T080932.266
 

unnamed - 2021-05-24T080936.890

Source: TheBlock
 
But while their CeFi counterparts had technical issues, delayed fund transfers, and at times were down altogether, DeFi worked exactly as designed, handling all-time-high volumes and record liquidations without even a hiccup.  As Camillo Russo of the Defiant put it, “As Ethereum DeFi grows to hold $100B in assets with millions of users, yesterday was a test on whether the space that aims to become the future of finance can withstand extreme volatility without breaking – and it passed.”   Jim Bianco had a similar take, arguing, “... while most are focused on wild price swings and unusual coins, understand it was the traditional financial exchanges that failed investors again, not decentralized finance. Those arguing they are creating a new better financial system won the day.”

So Where Do We Go From Here?
Fundamentals will matter again.  Maybe not right now, as the market is trading in a distressed fashion and there is a lot of pain out there amongst retail and institutional investors alike. But fundamentals will matter when the dust clears. Let’s start with what caused the digital assets rally since October 2020:
 
1) Low rates / low dollar
  • Still very much intact even though there are taper talks and inflationary data, as both rates and the dollar have not yet reacted, which is supportive of risk assets
2) Institutional money is entering the market
  • Institutional money doesn't come faster or slower based on price moves. Those trying to deploy will still deploy, and many of them are. It is possible, however, that the declines in GBTC & COIN may have been leading indicators, as downward price movements demonstrate that institutional money was already slowing.
3)  Elon Musk / Corporations
  • The ESG narrative (which is just that, a narrative) is unlikely to ever go away at this point.  Like a religion, no amount of science will change people's minds here, and this becomes more political theatre than substance. But Elon Musk's erratic tweets have brought ESG to center stage and this will likely give pause to corporates/institutional capital.
4)  Strong Fundamental Growth and Usage
  • DeFi, NFTs, Gaming and other types of digital assets are still seeing massive usage, and none of this was true the last time the market crashed over a year ago.  
So you have 2.5 out of 4 factors that are still very bullish for risk assets, which means there still should be buying power on the sidelines.   The question is just when and how it gets deployed. Those assets that cannot be valued (i.e. Bitcoin and most Layer-1 protocols) will be the hardest to have conviction on regarding price, but those that are asset-backed or have real cash flows (i.e. DeFi, CeFi, some NFT-platforms and sports/gaming platforms) in theory have valuations that are immune from a price shakeout.  And investors will be looking for these greenshoots.  For example, in March 2020, both Peloton (PTON) and Zoom (ZM) stocks got crushed in the first 3 weeks of the crisis, but the market soon realized that these were the types of companies that disproportionately benefit from a stay-at-home lockdown.  Similarly, there will be certain areas of digital assets that disproportionately benefit from a coordinated government/regulatory attack on miners and exchanges:

  • Miners in other jurisdictions, especially those with clean, renewable energy
  • Censorship resistance storage / archiving (i.e. Arweave)
  • Self-storage / wallets - free of centralized ownership
  • Bitcoin, as a free-standing store of value and government resistant monetary asset
  • And of course, DeFi, especially Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs)
As Arca senior analyst, Alex Woodard, noted over the weekend in an internal update…. because of the market volatility, DEX trading volume continued its up trend with its highest volume week ever. This was led by Uniswap and SushiSwap which make up more than 70% of ETH total DEX volumes.
 

unnamed - 2021-05-24T080941.816

 
Overall the crash in the market has made DEXs increasingly attractive as metrics improve when volatility increases. The P/S metrics are the lowest they have ever been for almost all projects in the DEX sector.  
 

unnamed - 2021-05-24T080950.476

unnamed - 2021-05-24T080955.073Source: Arca Estimates
 
It may take some time to heal these wounds, and regulatory risk is never going to completely go away, but this market will bounce back as it always has, though it’s likely that it will be other tokens besides Bitcoin that lead us back to all-time-highs.
 
What We’re Reading This Week
 
 

And That’s Our Two Satoshis! 
Thanks for reading everyone!   
Questions or comments, just let us know.  

The Arca Portfolio Management Team
Jeff Dorman, CFA - Chief Investment Officer
Katie Talati - Head of Research
Hassan Bassiri, CFA - PM / Analyst
Sasha Fleyshman -  Trader  
Wes Hansen -  Head of Trading & Operations
Alex Woodard- Analyst
Mike Geraci- Trader
  
 
 
 
 
 
To learn more or talk to us about investing in digital assets and cryptocurrency
call us now at (424) 289-8068.
 

 

 

 

Subscribe For the Latest Blockchain News & Analysis

 

 

Disclaimer: This commentary is provided as general information only and is in no way intended as investment advice, investment research, legal advice, tax advice, a research report, or a recommendation. Any decision to invest or take any other action with respect to any investments discussed in this commentary may involve risks not discussed, and therefore, such decisions should not be based solely on the information contained in this document. Please consult your own financial/legal/tax professional.

Statements in this communication may include forward-looking information and/or may be based on various assumptions. The forward-looking statements and other views or opinions expressed are those of the author, and are made as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated and there is no guarantee that any particular outcome will come to pass. The statements made herein are subject to change at any time. Arca disclaims any obligation to update or revise any statements or views expressed herein. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results and there can be no assurance that any future results will be realized. Some or all of the information provided herein may be or be based on statements of opinion. In addition, certain information provided herein may be based on third-party sources, which is believed to be accurate, but has not been independently verified. Arca and/or certain of its affiliates and/or clients may now, or in the future, hold a financial interest in investments that are the same as or substantially similar to the investments discussed in this commentary. No claims are made as to the profitability of such financial interests, now, in the past or in the future and Arca and/or its clients may sell such financial interests at any time. The information provided herein is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities, or a solicitation to provide investment advisory services.